[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173307167.3219.111.camel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:39:27 +1100
From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
To: Johan Henriksson <jhn98032@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Radeon xpress 200m and radeonfb kinda work
Hi.
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 01:16 +0100, Johan Henriksson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have gotten the radeon xpress 200m (the version without dedicated
> vmem)
> to work with radeonfb.
> The attached patch (against linux-2.6.20.1) works for me.
> Since I don't have any docs for the card I am unsure if the patch is
> 100% correct.
> Can someone else with a 200m try it out?
> (I have tested it by enabling fbcon and radeonfb in the kernel and
> added "video=radeonfb" to lilo. This gave me a nice 1280x800
> console :) )
>
> /Johan Henriksson
>
> Please CC, I'm not on the list.
>
> @@ -2329,7 +2332,7 @@ static int __devinit radeonfb_pci_regist
> /* -2 is special: means ON on mobility chips and do not
> * change on others
> */
> - radeonfb_pm_init(rinfo, rinfo->is_mobility ? 1 : -1, ignore_devlist, force_sleep);
> + radeonfb_pm_init(rinfo, -1,ignore_devlist, force_sleep);//rinfo->is_mobility ? 1 : -1);
That looks like it might break !200M. Maybe something line
rinfo->is_mobility && !rinfo->rs480 (with additional modifications to
define an rs480, of course) - or a more generic name indicating why the
rs480 is different?
Regards,
Nigel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists