[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070307150227.e5395d6c.zaitcev@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:02:27 -0800
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: ebuddington@...leyan.edu, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
USB development list <linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] khubd and ent:sda1 sucking CPU with reiser4 +
USB HD
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:18:29 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> I've never heard of a process failing to show up in a SysRq-t listing. It
> suggests something is wrong with the process management in the kernel you
> were using. That leads me to think a non -mm kernel might give more
> informative results.
I think, if a process is looping, it's not shown in SysRq-t. So maybe
khubd is on a CPU.
In RHEL we have a patch for SysRq-w, which showed all CPU states by
the way of a special IPI (unless looping with closed interrups, of course).
But this capability seems a bit degraded in stock SysRq-w. It might not
catch this (does not seem for me in 2.6.20).
Another possibility is, something killed khubd. It's only a process
after all. Remember how we had grief with it being killed by "telinit 1".
-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists