[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070307150530.73463dc5.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:05:30 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Petr Tesa__ík
<ptesarik@...e.cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove_arg_zero() rewrite
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:55:12 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 14:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:09:57 +0100
> > Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 15:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > > I mean.... what the hell?
> > > >
> > > > As you appear to have managed to work out what the sorry thing is trying to
> > > > do, would you have time to simply rip it out and completely rewrite it,
> > > > including a nice comment telling the world what this function's function is?
> > > >
> > > > Because what we have there is beyond repairing.
> > >
> > > Something like so?
> > > Boots uml seemingly without errors.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Rewrite remove_arg_zero() to be more parseable by untwisted minds.
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, Nick already had a go at this:
>
> Darn, must've fell off of lkml... or I missed it catching up my 4000+
> email backlog.
Hm, I've had a similar issue. Mail problems or what...
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists