[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45EE42BC.6030209@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:42:36 -0500
From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ian.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ian.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: don't use ZONE_DMA unless CONFIG_ZONE_DMA is set
in setup.c
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 05:52:46PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:52:59 -0500
> > Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ian.org> wrote:
> >
> > > If CONFIG_ZONE_DMA is ever undefined, ZONE_DMA will also not be defined,
> > > and setup.c won't compile. This wraps it with an #ifdef.
> > >
> >
> > I guess if anyone tries to disable ZONE_DMA on i386 they'll pretty quickly
> > discover that. But I don't think we need to "fix" it yet?
Oh, it's certainly not urgent. I sent it simply for correctness reasons.
It would've been nice to see the ZONE_DMA removal patches just #define
ZONE_DMA regardless, and include less #ifdefs scattered about; but at
this point, I'd just as soon prefer to see a proper way to allocate
things based on address constraints (as discussed in
http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/linux-ia64/0609/19036.html).
>
> CONFIG_ZONE_DMA isn't even optional on i386, so I'm curious how
> you could hit this compile failure.
>
Why, with custom code of course ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists