[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aec7e5c30703080041x6dd46309uef93ae0473bea91c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:41:30 +0900
From: "Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@...il.com>
To: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2
On 3/6/07, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Following panic ouccurred (always) on ia64/NUMA(with empty node.)
>
> Bug in here.
> ==
> void move_native_irq(int irq)
> {
> struct irq_desc *desc = irq_desc + irq;
>
> if (likely(!(desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PENDING)))
> return;
>
> if (unlikely(desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED))
> return;
>
> desc->chip->mask(irq); <---------maybe this *mask* is NULL pointer
> move_masked_irq(irq);
> desc->chip->unmask(irq);
> }
> ==
>
> Is "mask" always valid pointer ?
Not last time I checked. Have a look at "no_irq_chip" in
linux/kernel/irq/handle.c.
Your problem looks somewhat similar to the problem I had with irq
migration on ia64:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=29a002776ba5ef170446910b1f93c480cdd43706
/ magnus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists