linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: fix page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070308115843.GA22781@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:58:44 +0100
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, jdike@...toit.com, hugh@...itas.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean() vs non-linear vmas

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:21:01PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > Partial revert of commit: 204ec841fbea3e5138168edbc3a76d46747cc987
> > 
> > Non-linear vmas aren't properly handled by page_mkclean() and fixing that
> > would result in linear scans of all related non-linear vmas per page_mkclean()
> > invocation.
> > 
> > This is deemed too costly, hence re-instate the msync scan for non-linear vmas.
> > 
> > However this can lead to double IO:
> > 
> >  - pages get instanciated with RO mapping
> >  - page takes write fault, and gets marked with PG_dirty
> >  - page gets tagged for writeout and calls page_mkclean()
> >  - page_mkclean() fails to find the dirty pte (and clean it)
> >  - writeout happens and PG_dirty gets cleared.
> >  - user calls msync, the dirty pte is found and the page marked with PG_dirty
> >  - the page gets writen out _again_ even though its not re-dirtied.
> > 
> > To minimize this reset the protection when creating a nonlinear vma.
> > 
> > I'm not at all happy with this, but plain disallowing
> > remap_file_pages on bdis without BDI_CAP_NO_WRITEBACK seems to
> > offend some people, hence restrict it to root only.
> 
> Root only for !BDI_CAP_NO_WRITEBACK mappings doesn't make sense
> because:
> 
>   - just encourages insecure applications
> 
>   - there are no current users that want this and presumable no future
>     uses either
> 
>   - it's a maintenance burden: I'll have to layer the m/ctime update
>     patch on top of this

But you have to update m/ctime for BDI_CAP_NO_WRITEBACK mappings anyway
don't you?

> 
>   - the only pro for this has been that Nick thinks it cool ;)

Nonlinear in general, rather than this specifically.

> I think the proper way to deal with this is to
> 
>   - allow BDI_CAP_NO_WRITEBACK (tmpfs/ramfs) uses, makes database
>     people happy
> 
>   - for !BDI_CAP_NO_WRITEBACK emulate using do_mmap_pgoff(), should be
>     trivial, no userspace ABI breakage

Yeah that sounds OK.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/