lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:11:43 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	npiggin@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, jdike@...toit.com, hugh@...itas.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean() vs non-linear vmas

On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 12:48 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > However this still leaves the non-linear reclaim (Nick pointed it out as
> > a potential DoS and other people have corroborated this). I have no idea
> > on that to do about that.
> 
> OK, but that is a completely different problem, not affecting
> page_mkclean() or msync().
> 
> And it doesn't sound too hard to solve: when current algorithm doesn't
> seem to be making progress, then it will have to be done the hard way,
> searching for for all nonlinear ptes of a page to unmap.

Ah, you see, but that is when you've already lost.

The DoS is about the computational complexity of the reclaim, not if it
will ever come out of it with free pages.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ