lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5c77e7070703080620i3e2a3a64sf9d3121e4f6d382a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:20:02 +0100
From:	"Carsten Otte" <cotte.de@...il.com>
To:	"Martin Drab" <drab@...ler.fjfi.cvut.cz>
Cc:	hugh@...itas.com,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about memory mapping mechanism

On 3/8/07, Martin Drab <drab@...ler.fjfi.cvut.cz> wrote:
> The thing is that I'd like to prevent kernel to swap these pages out,
> because then I may loose some data when they are not available in time
> for the next round.

One think you could do is grab a reference to the pages upfront. When
you stop pushing data out to the userspace, or at least when the file
is released, you need to drop that reference again. You could even do
a kmap_atomic(), which would give you a kernel space mapping. That
way, you avoid copy_to_user for that data.
I am not sure if that's the "proper way", just my $0.02 how I would
try to solve it.

Carsten
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ