linux-kernel - Re: Problem with freezable workqueues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1173309045.3546.7.camel@johannes.berg>
Date:	Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:10:45 +0100
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with freezable workqueues

On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 21:31 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> For now, we have decided to make the workqueues nonfreezable (the patch for
> that has already been merged, AFAICT).

It isn't in 2.6.21-rc3.

> > I wanted to adapt the BUG_ON(block IO not from suspend code) 
> > patch from suspend2 but haven't gotten around to it yet.
> 
> That might be a good idea for other reasons too, but I'd prefer WARN_ON()
> instead of BUG_ON() when you're at it. ;-)

I won't be able to do that for quite a while... It's just on my "future
projects that would be nice" list :P

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (191 bytes)