[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070308164529.GA5308@nlxdcldnl2.cl.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 08:45:29 -0800
From: "Lombard, David N" <dnlombar@...ips.intel.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>, rjw@...k.pl,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, hpa@...or.com, magnus.damm@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Reloc Kernel List <fastboot@...ts.osdl.org>, ak@...e.de,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH 11/20] x86_64: wakeup.S misc cleanups
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:43:35PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > + movw $0x0e00 + 'i', %ds:(0xb8012)
> > > > + movb $0xa8, %al ; outb %al, $0x80;
> > > > +
> > >
> > > > - movw $0x0e00 + 'i', %ds:(0xb8012)
> > > > - movb $0xa8, %al ; outb %al, $0x80;
> > >
> > > Outbs were my debugging hacks, perhaps you can simply remove them at
> > > this point? Not sure how useful "Linux" debug print is, it can
> > > probably be removed, too.
> > >
> > I found these debugging hacks useful while debugging some problem with
> > my changes in this code. It helps to find out till what poing code flow
> > as reached in this assembly code. So I think its not a bad idea to let
> > this piece code be there.
>
> Ok. (I was not sure how common are displays of port 0x80).
They're now typically available in reasonably well stocked stores; I picked
one up from CompUSA about a year ago...
--
David N. Lombard, Intel, Irvine, CA
I do not speak for Intel Corporation; all comments are strictly my own.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists