lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070308111858.9352f51d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Thu, 8 Mar 2007 11:18:58 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: the usage of DEBUG_DRIVER seems ambiguous

On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:44:41 -0500 (EST) Robert P. J. Day wrote:

> 
>   the usage of the DEBUG_DRIVER preprocessor variable is a big
> confusing:
> 
> $ $ grep -rw DEBUG_DRIVER *
> drivers/net/sunlance.c:#undef DEBUG_DRIVER
> drivers/net/a2065.c:#ifdef DEBUG_DRIVER
> drivers/net/a2065.c:#ifdef DEBUG_DRIVER
> drivers/net/7990.c:#ifdef DEBUG_DRIVER
> drivers/net/7990.c:#ifdef DEBUG_DRIVER
> drivers/base/Kconfig:config DEBUG_DRIVER
> ...
> 
>   it's clearly a configuration variable, but it's also being used by
> itself in a few drivers/net/ source files.  is that deliberate?

The ones in drivers/net/ are just local driver debug controls.
They happen to have the same name as a (likely newer) kconfig symbol.

Is there a real problem that needs to be fixed?

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ