[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070308194740.GJ10574@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 11:47:40 -0800
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, Daniel Arai <arai@...are.com>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -mm tree
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@...p.org) wrote:
> Chris Wright wrote:
> > * Daniel Arai (arai@...are.com) wrote:
> >
> >> There's no good way to override __send_IPI_shortcut. I suppose we could add
> >> paravirt ops for __send_IPI_shortcut and every other op that touches the APIC.
> >>
> >
> > While that's basically what we did in Xen, it would make more sense to
> > build it into genapic which would give us one common abstraction to base
> > from. We should avoid adding pv_ops when existing infrastructure exists.
>
> I was looking at cutting in at a much higher level. The interface in
> <linux/smp.h> is a good match for Xen, so I was going to investigate
> making pv_ops at that level and see how it falls out.
I agree with that, but I think that's esp. for things like create and launch
new vcpu. The IPI bit I'm not as clear on, nor running this all on native
as well.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists