[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45F07334.7010207@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:33:56 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
CC: Daniel Arai <arai@...are.com>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -mm tree
Chris Wright wrote:
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@...p.org) wrote:
>
>> I guess by "rest of the kernel" you mean other stuff in arch/i386. Yes,
>> that's a concern, but maybe we can tease it apart in a sensible way.
>>
>
> Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Same with above (the native stuff), since
> we don't want a bunch of apic_read type of pv_ops (oh, wait... ;-) Of course,
> dom0 will be another can of worms, but one at a time.
>
Yeah, well we're already talking about a two-level model to accomodate
VMI, since it wants the mostly native SMP stuff except for the actual
apic operations.
Maybe hooking into genapic is the right way to mop up all the uses of
send_IPI and its variants. But from a quick grep it doesn't look like
they get called from too many places... Most of the callers seem to be
in arch/i386/kernek/smp.c, so they should be pretty easy to isolate.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists