[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070308.134825.45514445.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:48:25 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: anton@...ba.org
Cc: hpa@...or.com, hch@...radead.org, arjan@...radead.org,
zippel@...ux-m68k.org, dmlb2000@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gdb@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: PAGE_SIZE Availability Inconsistency
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:42:36 -0600
> > The easiest way to fix this would be to always park the swap magic at
> > the offset of the smallest page size in use, which is 4K. This is
> > analogous how the offset for the ext2/3 superblock got fixed at 1K --
> > for 1K blocks, it's the second block, but for larger blocks, it's part
> > of the first block. If we fix the offset of the swap magic at 4096
> > minus the offset that's already there, it will always fall in the first
> > page regardless of page size.
>
> Yeah that makes sense. I gave it a go by creating a MIN_PAGE_SIZE
> define, and allowing an architecture to override it if required.
I might be missing something but doesn't this break every
SWAP partition that was created with something other than
MIN_PAGE_SIZE?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists