lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:48:25 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	anton@...ba.org
Cc:	hpa@...or.com, hch@...radead.org, arjan@...radead.org,
	zippel@...ux-m68k.org, dmlb2000@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gdb@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: PAGE_SIZE Availability Inconsistency

From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:42:36 -0600

> > The easiest way to fix this would be to always park the swap magic at 
> > the offset of the smallest page size in use, which is 4K.  This is 
> > analogous how the offset for the ext2/3 superblock got fixed at 1K -- 
> > for 1K blocks, it's the second block, but for larger blocks, it's part 
> > of the first block.  If we fix the offset of the swap magic at 4096 
> > minus the offset that's already there, it will always fall in the first 
> > page regardless of page size.
> 
> Yeah that makes sense. I gave it a go by creating a MIN_PAGE_SIZE
> define, and allowing an architecture to override it if required.

I might be missing something but doesn't this break every
SWAP partition that was created with something other than
MIN_PAGE_SIZE?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ