linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tcp_cubic: use 32 bit math

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Mar 2007 05:16:28 +0100
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	rkuhn@....physik.tu-muenchen.de, andi@...stfloor.org,
	dada1@...mosbay.com, jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp_cubic: use 32 bit math

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 07:10:47PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
> >From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
> >Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:07:31 -0800
> >
> >  
> >>The basic calculation has to be done in 32 bits to avoid
> >>doing 64 bit divide by 3. The value x is only 22bits max
> >>so only need full 64 bits only for x^2.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
> >>    
> >
> >Applied, thanks Stephen.
> >
> >What about Willy Tarreau's supposedly even faster variant?
> >Or does this incorporate that set of improvements?
> >  
> That's what this is:
>    x = (2 * x + (uint32_t)div64_64(a, (uint64_t)x*(uint64_t)x)) / 3;

Confirmed, it's the same. BTW, has someone tested on a 64bit system if
it brings any difference ?

Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/