linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/3] fs: add an iovec iterator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070309104030.GB4503@infradead.org>
Date:	Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:40:30 +0000
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Nate Diller <nate.diller@...il.com>
Cc:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Linux Filesystems <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] fs: add an iovec iterator

On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:03:50PM -0800, Nate Diller wrote:
> i had a patch integrating the iodesc idea, but after some thought, had
> decided to call it struct file_io.  That name reflects the fact that
> it's doing I/O in arbitrary lengths with byte offsets, and struct
> file_io *fio contrasts well with struct bio (block_io).  I also had
> used the field ->nbytes instead of ->count, to clarify the difference
> between segment iterators, segment offsets, and absolute bytecount.

struct file_io sounds rather ugly to me, I don't know why.  And it's
really user I/O so we could call it struct uio (historical punt intended) :)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/