linux-kernel - Re: any thoughts yet on a "generic" ioctl.h?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45F14232.5060703@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Fri, 09 Mar 2007 12:17:06 +0100
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: any thoughts yet on a "generic" ioctl.h?

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> each simplification could be submitted as
> a separate arch-specific patch, as many things are.
> 
> i was more asking about the *philosophy* of that patch,

The justification of this initial patch is more obvious if followed up
by those subsequent patches which make use of the initial one.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== --== --===
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/