[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070309112118.GC3925@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:21:18 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Rudolf Marek <r.marek@...embler.cz>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?
Hi!
> >>Can you take this as a wishlist item?
> >>
> >>It would be nice if next version of acpi specs supported table
> >>
> >>'AML / SMM BIOS will access these ports'
> >>
> >>...so we can get it correct with acpi4 or something..?
> >>
> >
> >I can only second Pavel's wish here. This would be highly convenient
> >for OS developers to at least know which resources are accessed by AML
> >and SMM. Without this information, we can never be sure that OS-level
> >code won't conflict with ACPI or SMM.
> >
> >
> BIOS vendors are not required to support latest and greatest ACPI spec.
> So even if some future spec version
> will include this ports description, we will still have majority of
> hardware not exporting it...
That's okay... vendors are not required to support _ACPI_, but they
mostly do. Can we get the "ports used by BIOS" table to the spec?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists