[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070309132922.GB14907@MAIL.13thfloor.at>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:29:22 +0100
From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, pj@....com,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, winget@...gle.com,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xemul@...ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcfs core patch
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:07:27PM +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
>> nobody actually cares about a precise accounting and
>> calculating shares or partitions of whatever resource,
>> all that matters is that you have a way to prevent a
>> potential hostile environment from sucking up all your
>> resources (or even a single one) resulting in a DoS
> This is not true. People care. Reasons:
> - resource planning
> - fairness
> - guarantees
let me make that a little more clear ...
_nobody_ cares wether a shared memory page is
accounted as full page or as fraction of a page
(depending on the number of guests sharing it)
as long as the accounted amount is substracted
correctly when the page is disposed
so there _is_ a difference between _false_
accounting (which seems what you are referring
to in the next paragraph) and imprecise, but
consistant accounting (which is what I was
talking about)
best,
Herbert
> What you talk is about security only. Not the above issues.
> So good precision is required. If there is no precision at all,
> security sucks as well and can be exploited, e.g. for CPU
> schedulers doing an accounting based on jiffies accounting in
> scheduler_tick() it is easy to build an application consuming
> 90% of CPU, but ~0% from scheduler POV.
> Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists