linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c-core: i2c bitbang gpio structure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:55:40 +0100
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...log.com>
Cc:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...xity.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-core: i2c bitbang gpio structure

Hi Bryan,

On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:13:21 +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> A new structure is added to i2c-core for GPIO-based I2C interface
> adapter. My latest GPIO based I2C adapter driver for Blackfin system
> will use this stuff. And also IXP4XX GPIO based I2C driver can also be
> moved to this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...log.com> 
> ---
>  include/linux/i2c.h |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: include/linux/i2c.h
> ===================================================================
> --- include/linux/i2c.h	(revision 2813)
> +++ include/linux/i2c.h	(working copy)
> @@ -201,6 +201,26 @@ struct i2c_algorithm {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> + * Some chips do not have an I2C unit, so GPIO lines are just used to 
> + * Used as platform_data to provide GPIO pin information to this kind GPIO 
> + * based I2C driver.
> + */
> +struct i2c_bitbang_gpio {
> +	int sda;
> +	int scl;
> +};

Why would this be included in the generic i2c.h header file? As far as
I can see this structure only makes sense for bit-banged I2C busses, so
this structure should be declared in i2c-algo-bit.h.

Also, this structure alone isn't very useful. I'm waiting to see
drivers actually making use of it before I will consider merging this
patch at all.

> +
> +static inline int i2c_bitbang_gpio_sda(struct i2c_bitbang_gpio *gpio)
> +{
> +	return (gpio->sda);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int i2c_bitbang_gpio_scl(struct i2c_bitbang_gpio *gpio)
> +{
> +	return (gpio->scl);
> +}

What's the point of these?

-- 
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/