[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703100723.51858.kernel@kolivas.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 07:23:51 +1100
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
To: Mark Lord <liml@....ca>
Cc: Serge Belyshev <belyshev@...ni.sinp.msu.ru>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc3-mm1 RSDL results
On Saturday 10 March 2007 05:07, Mark Lord wrote:
> Mmm.. when it's good, it's *really* good.
> My desktop feels snappier and all of that.
>
> No noticeable jerkiness of windows/scrolling,
> which I *do* observe with the stock scheduler.
Thats good.
> But when it's bad, it stinks.
> Like when a "make -j2" kernel rebuild is happening in a background window
And that's bad. When you say "it stinks" is it more than 3 times slower? It
should be precisely 3 times slower under that load (although low cpu using
things like audio wont be affected by running 3 times slower). If it feels
like much more than that much slower, there is a bug there somewhere. As
another reader suggested, how does it run with the compile 'niced'? How does
it perform with make (without a -j number).
> This is on a Pentium-M 760 single-core, w/2GB SDRAM (notebook).
What HZ are you running? Are you running a Beryl desktop?
> JADP (Just Another Data Point).
Appreciated, thanks.
> Mark
--
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists