[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703090227490.27568@kepler.fjfi.cvut.cz>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 02:31:54 +0100 (CET)
From: Martin Drab <drab@...ler.fjfi.cvut.cz>
To: Carsten Otte <cotte.de@...il.com>
cc: hugh@...itas.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about memory mapping mechanism
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Martin Drab wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Martin Drab wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Carsten Otte wrote:
> >
> > > On 3/8/07, Martin Drab <drab@...ler.fjfi.cvut.cz> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The thing is that I'd like to prevent kernel to swap these pages out,
> > > > because then I may loose some data when they are not available in time
> > > > for the next round.
> > >
> > > One think you could do is grab a reference to the pages upfront.
> >
> > I'm not really sure what exactly do you mean by "grab a reference
> > upfront"?
>
> I seem to get it now. So instead of setting PG_reserved upon allocation of
> the buffer pages, I should increase the referrence of the pages by calling
> get_page() on them and that would prevent the pages to get on the lru list
> and thus preventing them to be swapped out. Is that it?
Well, so I tried it. Truth is that the "Bad page" messages upon munmap(2)
are gone. But whether the pages are really prevented from being swapped
out? I don't know. I don't know how to find out.
Martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists