[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <75b66ecd0703091450l26bdc12es4091018f2d87f0d3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:50:29 -0500
From: "Lee Revell" <rlrevell@...-job.com>
To: "Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"Zachary Amsden" <zach@...are.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"john stultz" <johnstul@...ibm.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rusty Russell" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
"Chris Wright" <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
"Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: ABI coupling to hypervisors via CONFIG_PARAVIRT
On 3/9/07, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
> I think the sound example to the right really shows it. /dev/dsp has a
> consistent ABI on a ton of systems. The API below it, varies. Linux got
> file_operations and ALSA. Solaris/BSD may have its
> vnode-and-so-on-functions and some sort of OSS.
I think this is a poor example as applications lose a lot of
functionality (multiple stream mixing, software volume control, etc)
by going through the legacy /dev/dsp interface vs. using native ALSA.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists