[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070309231334.GB17084@flower.upol.cz>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:13:34 +0100
From: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hpa@...or.com, johannes@...solutions.net
Subject: Re: ALIGN (Re: [PATCH] Fix get_order())
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 08:38:27AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
> >
> > Probably it can be used to get rid of gccisms and "type fluff" due to
> > bitwise arithmetics in ALIGN?
>
> Hell no.
>
> The typeof is there to make sure we have the right type, and it's simple.
>
> The current ALIGN() macro is efficient as hell (generating just a simple
> mask+add). Turning it into some kind of horrible thing that uses ilog2()
> would be a total mistake.
OTOH, if i would write it this way
#define BALIGN(x,bits) ((((x) >> (bits)) + 1) << (bits))
that would give more convenient way of expessing alignment (values of
what are most widely used, i.e powers of two) without log2(:)
requirement, no?
arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c: addr = ALIGN(addr+1,1UL<<HTLB_AREA_SHIFT);
arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c: addr = ALIGN(addr+1,1<<SID_SHIFT);
But it's not conventional, of course, and name is ugly.
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists