[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703100212.05770.dtor@insightbb.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:12:04 -0500
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use attribute groups in struct device_type
On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:55, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:54:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Greg,
> > >
> > > Please consider applying the patch below. It switches struct device_type
> > > to using attribute groups which os more flexible. I am using it in my
> > > input class_device -> device conversion (which is 99% done btw).
> >
> > Argh, I never sent you my version of that, did I? Very sorry about
> > that, I was working on fixing up the device namespace issue first, which
> > isn't done yet :(
> >
> > Anyway, my patch that did that is below, feel free to use it or not if
> > you want.
> >
> > > I looked through -mm and the latest git and there does not seem to be
> > > any users of struct device_type yet...
> >
> > Yes, the input patch below uses it and I have a block-device patch from
> > Kay in my tree that Andrew doesn't pull from (as it's usually really
> > messed up and I know to hide this kind of breakage from him...)
>
> Oops, that patch didn't use it, this follow-on patch from Kay uses them.
>
Ok, so input portion in your tree does not use type->attrs so we don't
have a conflict here. Unless my patch messes up Kay's blockdev patch
badly I'd like you to accept it. Input uses 3 attribute groups and I
don't want to open-code their creation/removal.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists