[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173520296.7128.9.camel@localhost>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 10:51:36 +0100
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, akpm@...l.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, sam@...nborg.org, rmk@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Complain about missing system calls.
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 19:54 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > We need additional gunk for syscalls that can be called from SPEs on
> > cell
>
> Can that gunk not be auto generated?
>
> I know s390 does in some cases, but it looks quite auto generatable to me.
The system call tables and the compat wrapper are all manually created.
If we manage to get the prototypes for the system calls in a parseable
format at least the compat wrappers could be auto-generated. I see two
pitfalls: 1) some compat system calls are directly wired to the system
call table while others need the compat_wrapper detour, 2) override of
system calls with "meta" system calls like sys_socket or sys_ipc.
--
blue skies, IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Martin Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Johann Weihen
Geschäftsführung: Herbert Kircher
Martin Schwidefsky Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Linux on zSeries Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart,
Development HRB 243294
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists