[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45F2D3CE.1060008@goop.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 07:50:38 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: question about periodic clocks
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Good point. I never thought about that and we set the period in the
> clock event device itself. You are right, the clockevents layer should
> hand over the period either with the set_mode call or seperately.
> Probably with the set_mode call, as it is needed exactly there and we
> don't want to have a "if (dev->mode == XXX)" check in set_next_event().
>
> I look into this.
>
>
So, in the meantime, the period is 1/HZ?
I also have a question about clockevent cpumasks. I was using the lapic
clockevent as a model, but as I understand it there's a lapic per CPU,
which explains why it registers a clockevent per cpu with that cpu alone
in the cpumask.
The Xen timer is a bit different; I guess more like hpet. There's a
single (virtual-)machine-wide timer, which is "owned" by the last cpu
with programmed it; ie, that cpu is the one which gets the resulting
event interrupt. Does this mean I should register a single clockevent
device with a cpumask of CPU_MASK_ALL? Or should I constrain it to a
single cpu?
There's a comment in hpet.c saying
* Start hpet with the boot cpu mask and make it
* global after the IO_APIC has been initialized.
but I don't see any place where the hpet cpumask is updated.
Thanks,
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists