[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070310163109.GA5901@Krystal>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:31:09 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mbligh@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix sparc TIF_USEDFPU flag atomicity
* William Lee Irwin III (wli@...omorphy.com) wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:26:46 -0800, William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com> wrote:
> >> Oh dear. Could we bit a bit more idiomatic here? For instance,
> >> something like:
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:29:44AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > Ok I pulled the sparc32 patch back out until there is some
> > consensus here :)
>
> It's just a minor touch-up. If Mathieu is okay with it, I'd rather
> leave him as the author and just send along an Acked-by: with it.
> I'm not terribly attached to it, either. I just choked on my soda
> when I saw set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(fpt), TI_USEDFPU)
> etc. go by. (Which reminds me, I really need to figure out how to
> consolidate the UP and SMP cases for all this.)
>
>
> -- wli
Hello,
William's implementation is indeed neater than mine. So the consensus
goes to his patch as far as I'm concerned.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists