[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45F2F727.7010406@rtr.ca>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:21:27 -0500
From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc: Serge Belyshev <belyshev@...ni.sinp.msu.ru>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc3-mm1 RSDL results
Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Saturday 10 March 2007 05:07, Mark Lord wrote:
>> Mmm.. when it's good, it's *really* good.
>> My desktop feels snappier and all of that.
>..
>> But when it's bad, it stinks.
>> Like when a "make -j2" kernel rebuild is happening in a background window
>
> And that's bad. When you say "it stinks" is it more than 3 times slower? It
> should be precisely 3 times slower under that load (although low cpu using
> things like audio wont be affected by running 3 times slower). If it feels
> like much more than that much slower, there is a bug there somewhere.
Scrolling windows is incredibly jerkey, and very very sluggish
when images are involved (eg. a large web page in firefox).
> As another reader suggested, how does it run with the compile 'niced'? How does
> it perform with make (without a -j number).
Yes, it behaves itself when the "make -j2" is nice'd.
>> This is on a Pentium-M 760 single-core, w/2GB SDRAM (notebook).
>
> What HZ are you running? Are you running a Beryl desktop?
HZ==1000, NO_HZ, Kubunutu Dapper Drake distro, ATI X300 open-source X.org driver.
Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists