linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1173614931.6927.36.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Date:	Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:08:51 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc:	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2

On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 22:48 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the report. I'm assuming you're describing a single hyperthread P4 
> here in SMP mode so 2 logical cores. Can you elaborate on whether there is 
> any difference as to which cpu things are bound to as well? Can you also see 
> what happens with lame not niced to +5 (ie at 0) and with lame at nice +19.

Yes, one P4/HT/SMP. No change at nice 0, but setting the encoders to
nice 19 did put X/gforce ~back where they were with 2.6.21-rc3.  Tasks
don't seem to be bound to any particular cpu, relies on load balancing
(which appears to be working).

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/