[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703112145.10767.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:45:10 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>
Cc: Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: SwSusp to disk doesn't work - Try 2
On Sunday, 11 March 2007 21:28, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb:
> > On Sunday, 11 March 2007 21:23, Milan Broz wrote:
> >
> >> Rafael J. Wysocki:
> >>
> >>> Ah, NO_HZ. Thomas Gleixner's address added to the Cc list.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> short printk trace
> >>>>
> >>>> enable_nonboot_cpus
> >>>> _cpu_up
> >>>> raw_notifier_callchain (CPU_UP_PREPARE)
> >>>> ...
> >>>> update_sched_domains
> >>>> detach_destroy_domains
> >>>> [waits here] --> synchronize_sched (==synchronize_rcu)
> >>>>
> >>> Well, I think the call to wait_for_completion() does not return, probably
> >>> because the task supposed to complete the completion is frozen at this
> >>> point. Can you please try to confirm that it gets stuck on
> >>> wait_for_completion() in synchronize_rcu()?
> >>>
> >> Yes, it's in wait_for_completion() in synchronize_rcu().
> >> As noted in some previous mail, it will wake up after
> >> event - key press etc.
> >>
> >> Patch in http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/7/255 solves different problem.
> >> I added it to my quilt and applied anyway -> no change.
> >>
> >
> > Does the problem go away if NO_HZ is unset?
> >
>
> i tried to boot with nohz=off, but the problem did persist.
Okay, but could you please compile the kernel without NO_HZ and retest?
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists