[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45F46D33.1050808@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:57:23 +0100
From: Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: SwSusp to disk doesn't work - Try 2
Thomas Meyer napsal(a):
> Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb:
>> On Sunday, 11 March 2007 21:23, Milan Broz wrote:
>>
>>> Rafael J. Wysocki:
>>>
>>>> Ah, NO_HZ. Thomas Gleixner's address added to the Cc list.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> short printk trace
>>>>>
>>>>> enable_nonboot_cpus
>>>>> _cpu_up
>>>>> raw_notifier_callchain (CPU_UP_PREPARE)
>>>>> ...
>>>>> update_sched_domains
>>>>> detach_destroy_domains
>>>>> [waits here] --> synchronize_sched (==synchronize_rcu)
>>>>>
>>>> Well, I think the call to wait_for_completion() does not return, probably
>>>> because the task supposed to complete the completion is frozen at this
>>>> point. Can you please try to confirm that it gets stuck on
>>>> wait_for_completion() in synchronize_rcu()?
>>>>
>>> Yes, it's in wait_for_completion() in synchronize_rcu().
>>> As noted in some previous mail, it will wake up after
>>> event - key press etc.
>>>
>>> Patch in http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/7/255 solves different problem.
>>> I added it to my quilt and applied anyway -> no change.
>>>
>> Does the problem go away if NO_HZ is unset?
>>
>
> i tried to boot with nohz=off, but the problem did persist.
Hmmmm, both variants (nohz=off or recompiled kernel without NO_HZ) works for me.
Milan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists