[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070311100723.GA10359@cvg>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:07:23 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel-list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: "Make nenuconfig" does not save parameters.
[Sam Ravnborg - Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 11:45:34PM +0100]
| On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 10:34:41PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
| >
| > On Mar 10 2007 22:27, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
| > >On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 07:23:41PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
| > >>
| > >> Whether the 'working config file path' should change when you do
| > >> 'Save as Alternate' or not, is a menuconfig axiom. Ask Sam Ravnborg
| > >> if you want it changed :-)
| > >
| > >Current behaviour is not logical but on the other hand I do not
| > >see a big need to make it so.
| > >It seems that people very seldom uses "save alternate" anyway.
| > >
| > >But patches are welcome.
| >
| > ^_^ The patch has already been posted, has not it?
| No.
| Either we keep current behaviour or we change to the "normal"
| behaviour with a "Save as..." as know from all other programs.
|
| Sam
|
Hi Sam,
here is a patch for menuconfig that shows current configuration
file. So I think menuconfig does its work well but the only
thing we need is to show location of an _active_ configuration.
Any comments are welcome (and you may swear at me too :)
Cyrill
View attachment "mconf-new-behaviour-v001.diff" of type "text/plain" (1640 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists