[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173692319.5835.611.camel@frg-rhel40-em64t-03>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:38:39 +0100
From: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 20:22 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Monday 12 March 2007 19:55, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Hmm. So... anything that's client/server is going to suffer horribly
> > unless niced tasks are niced all the way down to 19?
>
> Fortunately most client server models dont usually have mutually exclusive cpu
> use like this X case. There are many things about X that are still a little
> (/me tries to think of a relatively neutral term)... wanting. :(
I'd say the problem is less with X than with Xlib, which is heavily
round-trip-based. Fortunately XCB (its successor) seeks to be more
asynchronous.
Xav
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists