[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173691708.13341.60.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:28:28 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [patch] futex: PI state locking fix
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 10:13 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Subject: [patch] futex: PI state locking fix
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>
> testing of -rt by IBM uncovered a locking bug in wake_futex_pi(): the PI
> state needs to be locked before we access it.
>
> this patch has been tested in -rt. Must-have for v2.6.21.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> --
> kernel/futex.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux/kernel/futex.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/futex.c
> +++ linux/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uad
> if (!pi_state)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + spin_lock(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
> new_owner = rt_mutex_next_owner(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
>
> /*
> @@ -605,6 +606,7 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uad
> pi_state->owner = new_owner;
> spin_unlock_irq(&new_owner->pi_lock);
>
> + spin_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
> rt_mutex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
>
> return 0;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists