linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070312110833.GA12835@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:08:33 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2


* Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:

> The test scenario was one any desktop user might do with every 
> expectation responsiveness of the interactive application remain 
> intact. I understand the concepts here Con, and I'm not knocking your 
> scheduler. I find it to be a step forward on the one hand, but a step 
> backward on the other.

ok, then that step backward needs to be fixed.

> > We are getting good interactive response with a fair scheduler yet 
> > you seem intent on overloading it to find fault with it.
> 
> I'm not trying to find fault, I'm TESTING AND REPORTING.  Was.

Con, could you please take Mike's report of this regression seriously 
and address it? Thanks,

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/