linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8cd998d50703120458j6ac9f33h79728f2f599a3b91@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:58:11 +1100
From:	"Con Kolivas" <kernel@...ivas.org>
To:	"Gene Heskett" <gene.heskett@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Radoslaw Szkodzinski" <astralstorm@...il.com>,
	"Mike Galbraith" <efault@....de>, "ck list" <ck@....kolivas.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2

On 12/03/07, Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com> wrote:
> On Monday 12 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >To Con, I knew 2.6.20 worked with your earlier patches, so rather than
> >revert all the way, I just rebooted to 2.6.20.2-rdsl-0.30 and I'm going
> >to fire off another backup.  I suspect it will work, but will advise the
> >next time I wake up.
>
> After posting the above, I thought maybe I'd hit a target in the middle
> and build a 2.6.20.2, with your -0.30 patch, but...
>
> I'm going to have to build a 2.6.20.2, because with the rdsl-0.30 patch,
> its going to do a level 2 on my /usr/movies directory, which hasn't been
> touched in 90 days and has about 8.1GB in it according to du, and its
> going to do nearly all of it.  It shouldn't be anything but a directory
> listing file. But this is what amstatus is reporting:
> coyote:/usr/movies            2     7271m dumping      793m ( 10.91%)
> (7:26:00)
>
> And its also reporting far more data than exists it seems. As is du,
> for /var, which might have 2 gigs, its claiming 3.7!
>
> Honest folks, I'm not smoking anything, I quit 18 years ago.  Back to bed
> while this one bombs out too.
>
> --
> Cheers, Gene

Gene your last good kernel you said was 2.6.20 based. I don't see a
good reason even to use 2.6.20.2 as a base given that information.

--
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/