linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MMC: Clean up low voltage range handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45F49B28.7090609@overt.org>
Date:	Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:13:28 -0700
From:	Philip Langdale <philipl@...rt.org>
To:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Carlos Aguiar <carlos.aguiar@...t.org.br>,
	juha.yrjola@...idboot.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MMC: Clean up low voltage range handling

Pierre Ossman wrote:
> 
> We must not have the same specs. My simplified SD 2.0 physical spec
> defines everything below bit 15 as reserved.

I was a little unclear. Both specs define bit 7 as the low-voltage
range but only the MMC spec defines the actual voltage. As such, there
is no complete definition of a low voltage SD card. That's why I added
the sanity check in the actual code.

> Although this is a nice change, it confuses things to have two changes
> in one commit. Could you split them up and base it on my "for-andrew"
> branch?

Yeah, I thought you'd think that :-) I'll post the two diffs shortly.

Thanks,

--phil
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/