linux-kernel - Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:50:45 +0530
From:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sam@...ain.net, dev@...ru,
	xemul@...ru, pj@....com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, winget@...gle.com,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!

On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:56:43AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> What's wrong with that?

I had been asking around on "what is the fundamental unit of res mgmt
for vservers" and the answer I got (from Herbert) was "all tasks that are
in the same pid namespace". From what you are saying above, it seems to
be that there is no such "fundamental" unit. It can be a random mixture
of tasks (taken across vservers) whose resource consumption needs to be
controlled. Is that correct?

> > 	echo "cid 2" > /dev/cpu/prof/tasks 
> 
> Adding that feature sounds fine, 

Ok yes ..that can be a optional feature.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/