linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: [ANNOUNCE] RSDL completely fair starvation free interactive cpu scheduler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:37:19 -0400
From:	"michael chang" <thenewme91@...il.com>
To:	"jos poortvliet" <jos@...nkamer.nl>
Cc:	ck@....kolivas.org, "Al Boldi" <a1426z@...ab.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: [ANNOUNCE] RSDL completely fair starvation free interactive cpu scheduler

On 3/12/07, jos poortvliet <jos@...nkamer.nl> wrote:
> Op Monday 12 March 2007, schreef Al Boldi:
> >
> > It only takes one negatively nice'd proc to affect X adversely.
>
> goes faster than ever)? Or is this really the scheduler's fault?
>

Take this with a grain of salt, but, I don't think this is the
scheduler's _fault_. That said, if the scheduler can fix it, it's not
necessarily a bad thing.

-- 
~Mike
 - Just the crazy copy cat.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/