[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173718084.11945.51.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:48:04 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <hansendc@...ibm.com>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...ru>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] Data structures changes for RSS accounting
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 19:16 +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> now VE2 maps the same page. You can't determine whether this page is mapped
> to this container or another one w/o page->container pointer.
Hi Kirill,
I thought we can always get from the page to the VMA. rmap provides
this to us via page->mapping and the 'struct address_space' or anon_vma.
Do we agree on that?
We can also get from the vma to the mm very easily, via vma->vm_mm,
right?
We can also get from a task to the container quite easily.
So, the only question becomes whether there is a 1:1 relationship
between mm_structs and containers. Does each mm_struct belong to one
and only one container? Basically, can a threaded process have
different threads in different containers?
It seems that we could bridge the gap pretty easily by either assigning
each mm_struct to a container directly, or putting some kind of
task-to-mm lookup. Perhaps just a list like
mm->tasks_using_this_mm_list.
Not rocket science, right?
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists