[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070312062349.GN6095633@melbourne.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:23:49 +1100
From: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/8] per backing_dev dirty and writeback page accounting
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 07:04:46PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
>
> [tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com: bugfix]
>
> Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>:
>
> Changes:
> - updated to apply after clear_page_dirty_for_io() race fix
>
> This is needed for
>
> - balance_dirty_pages() deadlock fix
> - fuse dirty page accounting
>
> I have no idea how serious the scalability problems with this are. If
> they are serious, different solutions can probably be found for the
> above, but this is certainly the simplest.
Atomic operations to a single per-backing device from all CPUs at once?
That's a pretty serious scalability issue and it will cause a major
performance regression for XFS.
I'd call this a showstopper right now - maybe you need to look at
something like the ZVC code that Christoph Lameter wrote, perhaps?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists