[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070312233113.GD6832@MAIL.13thfloor.at>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:31:13 +0100
From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>
To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xemul@...ru, pj@....com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, winget@...gle.com,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:50:45PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:56:43AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > What's wrong with that?
>
> I had been asking around on "what is the fundamental unit of res mgmt
> for vservers" and the answer I got (from Herbert) was "all tasks that are
> in the same pid namespace". From what you are saying above, it seems to
> be that there is no such "fundamental" unit. It can be a random mixture
> of tasks (taken across vservers) whose resource consumption needs to be
> controlled. Is that correct?
just means that the current Linux-VServer behaviour
is a subset of that, no problem there as long as
it really _is_ a subset :) we always like to provide
more features in the future, no problem with that :)
best,
Herbert
> > > echo "cid 2" > /dev/cpu/prof/tasks
> >
> > Adding that feature sounds fine,
>
> Ok yes ..that can be a optional feature.
>
> --
> Regards,
> vatsa
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@...ts.osdl.org
> https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists