[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45F49BE9.6070803@overt.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:16:41 -0700
From: Philip Langdale <philipl@...rt.org>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Carlos Aguiar <carlos.aguiar@...t.org.br>,
juha.yrjola@...idboot.com
Subject: [PATCH] MMC: Fix handling of low-voltage cards
Fix handling of low voltage MMC cards.
The latest MMC and SD specs both agree that support for
low-voltage operations is indicated by bit 7 in the OCR.
The MMC spec states that the low voltage range is
1.65-1.95V while the SD spec leaves the actual voltage
range undefined - meaning that there is still no such
thing as a low voltage SD card.
However, an old Sandisk spec implied that bits 7.0
represented voltages below 2.0V in 1V or 0.5V increments,
and the code was accordingly written with that expectation.
This confusion meant that host drivers attempting to support
the typical low voltage (1.8V) would set the wrong bits in
the host OCR mask (usually bits 5 and/or 6) resulting in the
the low voltage mode never being used.
This change corrects the low voltage range and adds sanity
checks on the reserved bits (0-6) and for SD cards that
claim to support low-voltage operations.
Signed-off-by: Philip Langdale <philipl@...rt.org>
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index c87ce56..74ebd97 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -317,6 +317,24 @@ static u32 mmc_select_voltage(struct mmc
{
int bit;
+ /*
+ * Sanity check the voltages that the card claims to
+ * support.
+ */
+ if (ocr & 0x7F) {
+ printk("%s: card claims to support voltages below "
+ "the defined range. These will be ignored.\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host));
+ ocr &= ~0x7F;
+ }
+
+ if (host->mode == MMC_MODE_SD && (ocr & MMC_VDD_165_195)) {
+ printk("%s: SD card claims to support the incompletely "
+ "defined 'low voltage range'. This will be ignored.\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host));
+ ocr &= ~MMC_VDD_165_195;
+ }
+
ocr &= host->ocr_avail;
bit = ffs(ocr);
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 2f34ae3..a80c043 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -669,8 +669,7 @@ static void sdhci_set_power(struct sdhci
pwr = SDHCI_POWER_ON;
switch (1 << power) {
- case MMC_VDD_17_18:
- case MMC_VDD_18_19:
+ case MMC_VDD_165_195:
pwr |= SDHCI_POWER_180;
break;
case MMC_VDD_29_30:
@@ -1290,7 +1289,7 @@ static int __devinit sdhci_probe_slot(st
if (caps & SDHCI_CAN_VDD_300)
mmc->ocr_avail |= MMC_VDD_29_30|MMC_VDD_30_31;
if (caps & SDHCI_CAN_VDD_180)
- mmc->ocr_avail |= MMC_VDD_17_18|MMC_VDD_18_19;
+ mmc->ocr_avail |= MMC_VDD_165_195;
if (mmc->ocr_avail == 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Hardware doesn't report any "
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
index 496f540..2aac62a 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
@@ -65,14 +65,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
unsigned int f_max;
u32 ocr_avail;
-#define MMC_VDD_145_150 0x00000001 /* VDD voltage 1.45 - 1.50 */
-#define MMC_VDD_150_155 0x00000002 /* VDD voltage 1.50 - 1.55 */
-#define MMC_VDD_155_160 0x00000004 /* VDD voltage 1.55 - 1.60 */
-#define MMC_VDD_160_165 0x00000008 /* VDD voltage 1.60 - 1.65 */
-#define MMC_VDD_165_170 0x00000010 /* VDD voltage 1.65 - 1.70 */
-#define MMC_VDD_17_18 0x00000020 /* VDD voltage 1.7 - 1.8 */
-#define MMC_VDD_18_19 0x00000040 /* VDD voltage 1.8 - 1.9 */
-#define MMC_VDD_19_20 0x00000080 /* VDD voltage 1.9 - 2.0 */
+#define MMC_VDD_165_195 0x00000080 /* VDD voltage 1.65 - 1.95 */
#define MMC_VDD_20_21 0x00000100 /* VDD voltage 2.0 ~ 2.1 */
#define MMC_VDD_21_22 0x00000200 /* VDD voltage 2.1 ~ 2.2 */
#define MMC_VDD_22_23 0x00000400 /* VDD voltage 2.2 ~ 2.3 */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists