[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703122022.43021.kernel@kolivas.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:22:42 +1100
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2
On Monday 12 March 2007 19:55, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 19:29 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > I'll save you the trouble. I just checked myself and indeed the load is
> > only 1. What this means is that although there are 2 tasks running, only
> > one is running at any time making a total load of 1. So, if we add two
> > other tasks that add 2 more to the load the total load is 3. However if
> > we weight the other two tasks at nice 5, they only add .75 each to the
> > load making a weighted total of 2.5. This means that X+Gforce together
> > should get a total of 1/2.5 or 40% of the overall cpu. That sounds like
> > exactly what you're describing is happening.
>
> Hmm. So... anything that's client/server is going to suffer horribly
> unless niced tasks are niced all the way down to 19?
Fortunately most client server models dont usually have mutually exclusive cpu
use like this X case. There are many things about X that are still a little
(/me tries to think of a relatively neutral term)... wanting. :(
--
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists