[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070313081805.GA22327@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:18:05 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2
* Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> [...] The situation as we speak is that you can run cpu intensive
> tasks while watching eye-candy. With RSDL, you can't, you feel the
> non-interactive load instantly. [...]
i have to agree with Mike that this is a material regression that cannot
be talked around.
Con, we want RSDL to /improve/ interactivity. Having new scheduler
interactivity logic that behaves /worse/ in the presence of CPU hogs,
which CPU hogs are even reniced to +5, than the current interactivity
code, is i think a non-starter. Could you try to fix this, please? Good
interactivity in the presence of CPU hogs (be them default nice level or
nice +5) is _the_ most important scheduler interactivity metric.
Anything else is really secondary.
Ingo
ps. please be nice to each other - both of you are long-time
scheduler contributors who did lots of cool stuff :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists