[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070313095808.GA19939@in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:28:08 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...il.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread_should_stop_check_freeze (was: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/7] Freezer: Remove PF_NOFREEZE from rcutorture thread)
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 09:16:29AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Document as well in the kernel_thread() API, as I notice people still
> > use kernel_thread() some places (ex: rtasd.c in powerpc arch)?
>
> They shouldn't use kernel_thread.
Hmm ..that needs to be documented as well then! I can easily count more
than dozen places where kernel_thread() is being used.
I agree though that kthread is a much cleaner interface to create/destroy
threads.
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists