linux-kernel - Re: Move to unshared VMAs in NOMMU mode?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1161.1173780855@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:14:15 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
Cc:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, bryan.wu@...log.com,
	Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
	"Kawai, Hidehiro" <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com>,
	Satoshi OSHIMA <soshima@...hat.com>, haoki@...hat.com,
	Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@...nline.de>
Subject: Re: Move to unshared VMAs in NOMMU mode? 

Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org> wrote:

> We (noMMU) folks need to have special code anyway - so why not put it there, 
> and try not to increase memory footprint?

I'd like to have the drivers and filesystems need to know as little as possible
about whether they're working in MMU-mode or NOMMU-mode - for the most part
such knowledge should be unnecessary.  Additionally, I'd rather not put special
case code in the generic parts of the NOMMU code.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/