linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1173785006.8561.19.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:23:26 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2

On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 21:06 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 March 2007 20:39, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> > > I just retested with the encoders at nice 0, and the x/gforce combo is
> > > terrible. [...]
> >
> > ok. So nice levels had nothing to do with it - it's some other
> > regression somewhere. How does the vanilla scheduler cope with the
> > exactly same workload? I.e. could you describe the 'delta' difference in
> > behavior - because the delta is what we are interested in mostly, the
> > 'absolute' behavior alone is not sufficient. Something like:
> >
> >  - on scheduler foo, under this workload, the CPU hogs steal 70% CPU
> >    time and the resulting desktop experience is 'choppy': mouse pointer
> >    is laggy and audio skips.
> >
> >  - on scheduler bar, under this workload, the CPU hogs are at 40%
> >    CPU time and the desktop experience is smooth.
> >
> > things like that - we really need to be able to see the delta.
> 
> I only find a slowdown, no choppiness, no audio stutter (it would be extremely 
> hard to make audio stutter in this design without i/o starvation or something 
> along those lines). The number difference in cpu percentage I've already 
> given on the previous email. The graphics driver does feature in this test 
> case as well so others' mileage may vary. Mike said it was terrible.

My first test run with lame at nice 0 was truly horrid, but has _not_
repeated, so disregard that as an anomaly.  For the most part, it is as
you say, things just get slower with load, any load.  I definitely am
seeing lurchiness which is not present in mainline.  No audio problems
with either kernel.

> > > [...]  Funny thing though, x/gforce isn't as badly affected with a
> > > kernel build.  Any build is quite noticable, but even at -j8, the
> > > effect doen't seem to be (very brief test warning applies) as bad as
> > > with only the two encoders running.  That seems quite odd.
> >
> > likewise, how does the RSDL kernel build behavior compare to the vanilla
> > scheduler's behavior? (what happens in one that doesnt happen in the
> > other, etc.)
> 
> Kernel compiles seem similar till the jobs get above about 3 where rsdl gets 
> slower but still smooth. Audio is basically unaffected either way.

It seems to be a plain linear slowdown.  The lurchiness I'm experiencing
varies in intensity, and is impossible to quantify.  I see neither
lurchiness nor slowdown in mainline through -j8.

> Don't forget all the rest of the cases people have posted.

Absolutely, all test results count.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/