[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070313130755.21d32627@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:07:55 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Prasanna S Panchamukhi <prasanna@...ibm.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] hwbkpt: Hardware breakpoints (was Kwatch)
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 01:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Well, I can add in the test for 0, but finding the set of always-on bits
> > in DR6 will have to be done separately. Isn't it possible that different
> > CPUs could have different bits?
>
> I don't know, but it seems unlikely. AFAIK all CPUs are presumed to have
> the same CPUID results, for example.
No. We merge the CPUID information to get a shared set of capability bits.
Generic PC systems with a mix of PII and PIII are possible. The voyager
architecture can have even more peculiar combinations of processor
modules installed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists